archive-com.com » COM » B » BCAUDITOR.COM

Total: 612

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • A Review of Financial Management Issues in the Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner | Auditor General of British Columbia
    the Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner Date July 1 2002 The report was discussed by the Legislative Assembly s Select Standing Committee on Public Accounts on October 1 2002 Report review financial management issues office police complaint commissioner pdf News Release review financial management issues office police complaint commissioner news release pdf Find a publication Keywords Start date Year Year 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 End date Year Year 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 Subject Any Annual Reports Education Environment Natural Resources Finance Follow up Reports Forestry Governance Accountability Health Information Technology Justice Public Safety Knowledge Management Miscellaneous Procurement Social Services Transportation Publications Resource Centre Quick Links What is a financial audit What is a performance audit Subscribe to alerts Notify me of new reports

    Original URL path: http://www.bcauditor.com/pubs/2002/report2/financial-management-office-police-complaint-commissioner-opcc (2016-02-12)
    Open archived version from archive


  • Response to a Request Contained in a Ministerial Statement by the Minister of Competition, Science and Enterprise to the Legislative Assembly on May 14, 2002 | Auditor General of British Columbia
    in a Ministerial Statement by the Minister of Competition Science and Enterprise to the Legislative Assembly on May 14 2002 Date July 1 2002 The report was discussed by the Legislative Assembly s Select Standing Committee on Public Accounts on October 1 2002 Report response request contained ministerial statement minister competition scien pdf Other Files response request minister comp science and enterprise pdf Find a publication Keywords Start date Year Year 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 End date Year Year 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 Subject Any Annual Reports Education Environment Natural Resources Finance Follow up Reports Forestry Governance Accountability Health Information Technology Justice Public Safety Knowledge Management Miscellaneous Procurement Social Services Transportation Publications Resource Centre Quick Links What is a financial audit What is a

    Original URL path: http://www.bcauditor.com/pubs/2002/special/response-request-minister-competition-science-enterprise (2016-02-12)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Step 2 - Decide if public participation should be used.
    of situations where public participation is voluntary but recommended 1 There is potential for the public to be significantly affected Citizens and organizations should be consulted if a government decision will considerably affect them Research shows Canadians increasingly expect to be consulted on decisions that impact them 2 Government has made a previous commitment to openness and transparency on the issue When the government has made a public promise to

    Original URL path: http://www.bcauditor.com/book/export/html/398 (2016-02-12)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Step 3 - Determine the issues related to the decision for each of the affected parties.
    appropriate for the decision at hand the next step is to determine how issues relating to the decision are viewed by the decision maker and the public and stakeholder groups Understanding the history of issues relating to a particular decision from the perspective of both the decision maker and interested or affected parties is paramount One way to determine how each of the affected or interested parties view issues relating

    Original URL path: http://www.bcauditor.com/book/export/html/400 (2016-02-12)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Step 4 - Determine the level of public participation that the decision-maker needs and what to consult on.
    participation requirements of the decision maker The decision making organization must confirm the type and amount of information needed to support decision making and the form that information must take in order to be credible and of use in influencing

    Original URL path: http://www.bcauditor.com/book/export/html/401 (2016-02-12)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Step 5 - Determine the public participation methods best suited to the needs of participants.
    decision maker s ability to create an environment that allows for meaningful dialogue Such environments are created by designing participation processes that meet the needs of those involved Matters to consider include What are the social and cultural considerations for

    Original URL path: http://www.bcauditor.com/book/export/html/402 (2016-02-12)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Step 6 - Determine how public participation is to support and link to the decision.
    and the process of participating with the public The following table illustrates the links between the steps of a generic decision making process the public participation objective for each and possible tools to support each milestone Steps in Decision Making Process Objectives of Participation Examples of Participation Tools Identify the problem and decision needed To understand background and decision to be made Press release website announcement Undertake research To receive

    Original URL path: http://www.bcauditor.com/book/export/html/403 (2016-02-12)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Step 7 - Determine how the results are to be used.
    consider how public input will be recorded and analyzed the decision maker will consider public input and the public will know they have been heard Communicating the impact of participation to stakeholder groups and the public is one of the greatest weaknesses in public participation processes It is important to manage expectations throughout the public participation process in two ways by explaining what opportunities exist to influence the decision maker

    Original URL path: http://www.bcauditor.com/book/export/html/404 (2016-02-12)
    Open archived version from archive



  •